EVALUAN EL TRASPLANTE AUTOLOGO DE PRECURSORES HEMATOPOYETICOS EN EL AMBITO DE LA MEDICINA AMBULATORIA
|
(especial para SIIC © Derechos reservados) |
|
El trasplante autólogo de precursores hematológicos de sangre periférica puede llevarse a cabo de manera segura y eficaz en pacientes ambulatorios. |
|
Recepción del artículo: 21 de Noviembre, 2002
|
|
Aprobación: 10 de Enero, 2003
|
Resumen
El trasplante de precursores hematopoyéticos, un método cada vez más frecuentemente usado en el tratamiento de pacientes con enfermedades malignas y trastornos genéticos, se ha efectuado tradicionalmente en enfermos internados. Las complicaciones inmediatas que ocurren durante la neutropenia (período preinjerto), particularmente aquellas debidas a infección y mucositis que requieren tratamiento inmed iato, dificultaron la posibilidad del trasplante en el contexto de la medicina ambulatoria. Retrospectivamente analizamos datos de mujeres receptoras de trasplante autólogo de precursores hematopoyéticos de sangre periférica fuera del hospital. El ensayo se realizó finalmente sobre 105 mujeres con cáncer de mama que recibieron profilaxis con antibióticos de amplio espectro. El régimen seleccionado de acondicionamiento no produjo o sólo generó manifestaciones leves a nivel de mucosa oral y gastrointestin al. Todas las pacientes fueron controladas diariamente en los consultorios externos de la clínica de trasplante y el personal médico especializado estuvo disponible día y noche. La patología infecciosa fue considerablemente baja, sin que se registraran fallecimientos o eventos adversos graves. La duración de la neutropenia fue corta (en promedio 7.5 días). El 50% de las enfermas debió internarse por fiebre persistente (estadía promedio de 3 días). El esquema de acondicionamiento que respeta mucosas, el uso de factores estimulantes de colonias, la profilaxis con antibióticos de amplio espectro y, esencialmente, la disponibilidad inmediata de personal médico y el control diario de las enfermas fueron elementos cruciales para garantizar el éxito del trasplante bajo esta modalidad. Por lo tanto, el trasplante autó logo de precursores hematopoyéticos es factible en el ámbito de la medicina ambulatoria. Se requieren estudios clínicos cuidadosos para evaluar su aplicabilidad en otras técnicas de trasplante (técnica sin mieloablación en el grupo alogénico) que involuc ran diferentes poblaciones de pacientes ambulatorios. En caso de confirmarse el éxito, este tipo de trasplante podrá representar ventajas económicas importantes y, esencialmente, podría significar una mejora sustancial en la calidad de vida de los enfermos.
Palabras clave
Trasplante, ámbito ambulatorio, profilaxis antibiótica.
Clasificación en siicsalud
Artículos originales> Expertos del Mundo>
página www.siicsalud.com/des/des031/03203000.htm
Especialidades
Principal: Hematología
Relacionadas: Oncología, Genética Humana, Medicina Interna
Enviar correspondencia a: Pranatharthi H. Chandrasekar, M.D. Professor of Medicine Division of Infectious Diseases Wayne State University, Department of Medicine Karmanos Cancer Institute Harper University Hospital 3990 John R, 4 Brush Center Detroit, MI 48201, EE.UU.
Artículo completo (castellano)
Extensión:
+/- 11.3 páginas impresas en papel A4
Exclusivo para suscriptores/ assinantes |
AUTOLOGOUS STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION IN THE OUTPATIENT SETTING: FEASIBLE OR NOT?
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, an increasingly popular method to treat malignancies and genetic disorders, has been traditionally performed in an in-hospital setting. Immediate complications during neutropenia (pre-engraftment period), particularly those due to infection and mucositis that need prompt care have made transplantation difficult in the outpatient setting. We retrospectively analyzed data on women undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem/progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) out of the hospital. There were 105 women with breast cancer receiving broad-spectrum antimicrobial prophylaxis. The conditioning regimen chosen produced minimal or no oral/gastrointestinal mucositis. All women were seen daily in the out- patient transplant clinic; appropriate medical personnel were readily available during day/night. Infectious morbidity was remarkably low with no deaths or serious adverse events. Duration of neutropenia was short (mean, 7.5 days). Fifty percent women were hospitalized usually due to persistent fever; mean duration of hospital stay was 3 days. Mucositis-sparing conditioning regimen, liberal use of colony-stimulating factors, use of broad-spectrum antimicrobial prophylaxis and importantly, ready availability of medical personnel and close daily care were the key elements for successful transplantation in the outpatient setting. Thus, autologous stem cell transplantation as an outpatient procedure is feasible. Careful clinical studies are needed of other transplant techniques (e.g. non-myeloablative technique in the allogeneic group) involving different populations in the out-of-hospital setting. If successful, transplant procedure will become economically far less expensive and importantly, patient's quality of life is likely to be significantly improved.
Key words
Transplantation, outpatient setting, antimicrobial prophylaxis.
|
 |
Full text (english)
para suscriptores/ assinantes
|
Bibliografía del artículo
- Nosanchuk JD, Sepkowitz KA, Pearse RN, et al. Infectious complications of autologous bone marrow and peripheral stem cell transplantation for refractory leukemia and lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 18:355-359.
- Mossad JB, Longworth DL, Goormastic M, et al. Early infectious complications in autologous bone marrow transplantation: a review of 219 patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 18:265-271.
- D'Antonio D, Iacone A, Pierelli L, et al. Patterns of recovery phase infection after autologuos blood progenitor cell transplantation in patients with malignancies. The Gruppo Italiano di Studio per la Manipolazione Cellulare in Ematologia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1995; 14:552-556.
- TR, Mangan KF, Goldbert SL, et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor accelerates neurtophil engraftment following peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: a prospective, randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13:1323-1327.
- Gilbert C, Meisenberg B, Vredenburgh J, et al. Sequential prophylactic oral and empiric once-daily parenteral antibiotics for neutropenia and fever after high-dose chemotherapy and autologuos bone marrow support. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12:1005- 1011.
- Peters WP, Ross M, Vredenburgh JJ, et al. The use of intensive clinic support to permit outpatient autologous bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer. Semin Oncol 1994; 21 (Suppl 7):25-31.
- Meisenberg B, Gollard R, Brehm T, et al. Prophylactic antibiotics eliminate bacteremia and allow safe outpatient management following high-dose chemotherapy and autologuous stem cell rescue. Support Care Cancer 1996; 4:364-369.
- Meisenberg BR, Miller WE, McMillan R, et al. Outpatient high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell rescue for hematologic and nonhematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15:11-17.
- Jagannath S, Vesole DH, Zhang M, et al. Feasibility and cost-effectiveness of outpatient autotransplants in multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 20:445-450.
- Chandrasekar PH, Abraham OC, Klein J, et al. Low infectious Morbidity after intensive chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in the outpatient setting for women with breast cancer. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32:546-551.
- Ruescher TJ, Sodefi A, Scrivani SJ, et al. The impact of mucositis on alpha- hemolytic streptococcal infection in patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Cancer 1998; Jun 1;82(1):2275- 2281.
- Offidani M, Corvatta L, Olivieri A, et al. Infectious complications after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation followed by G-CSF. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999 Nov.; 24(10):1079-1087.
- Bochud PY, Calandra T, Francioli P. Bacteremia due to viridans streptococci in neutropenic patients: a review. Am J Med 1994; 97:256-264.
- Pizzo PA, Ladisch S, Robichaud K. Treatment of gram-positive septicemia in cancer patients. Cancer 1980; 45:206-207.
- Ozer H, Armitage JO, Bennett CL, et al. 2000 update of recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18:3558-3585.
- Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP, et al. 2002 Guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34:730-751.
- Kern W, Kurrle E. Ofloxacin versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for prevention of infection in patients with acute leukemia and granulocytopenia. Infection 1991; 19:73-80.
- Bow EJ, Mandell LA, Louie TJ, et al. Quinolone-based chemoprophylaxis in neutropenic patients: effect of augmented gram-positive activity on infectious morbidity. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125:183-190.
- Harvathova Z, Spanik S, Sufliarsky J, et al. Bacteremia due to methicillin-resistant staphylococci occurs more frequently in neutropenia patients who received antimicrobial prophylaxis and is associated with higher mortality in comparison of methicillin-sensitive bacteremia. Int J Antimicrob Agents 1998; 10:55-58.
- Carratala J, Fernandez-Sevilla A, Tubau F, et al. Emergence of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli bacteremia in neutropenic patients with cancer who have received prophylactic norfloxacin. Clin Infect Dis 1995; 20:557-560.
- Somolinos N, Arranz R, Del Rey MC, et al. Superinfections by Escherichia coli resistant to fluorouinolones in immunocompromised pateints [letter]. J Antimicrob Chemother 1992; 30:730-731.
- Kern WV, Andriof E, Oethinger M, et al. Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli at a cancer center. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38:681- 687.
- Cometta A, Calandra T, Bille J, et al. Escherichia coli resistant to fluoroquinolones in patients with cancer and neutropenia [letter]. N Engl J Med 1994; 330:1240- 1241.
- Broun ER, Wheat JL, Kneebone PH, et al. Randomized trial of the addition of gram-positive prophylaxis to standard antimicrobial prophylaxis for patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38(3):576-579.
- Naqvi B, Dorsky D, Ali SA, et al. Efficacy of clarithromycin in preventing viridans streptococcal bacteremia following autologous stem cell transplantation. Infection 2001 Aug.; 29:201-204.
- Hidalgo M, Hornedo J, Lumbreras C, et al. Lack of ability of ciprofloxacin-rifampin prophylaxis to decrease infection-related morbidity in neutropenic patients given cytotoxic therapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997 May; 41:1175-1177.
- Palau J, Picon I, Angel Climent M, et al. Infection in patients with neutropenia that undergo an autologuous peripheral blood stem cell transplant due to breast cancer. Enferm Infec Microbiol Clin 2001 Nov; 19:422-427.
- Dignani MC, Mykietiuk A, Michelet M, et al. Valacyclovir prophylaxis for the prevention of Herpes simplex virus reactivation in recipients of progenitor cells transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 29:263-267.
- Marr KA, Crippa F, Carter R, et al. Epidemiology of fungal infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients in the1990s [abstract]. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 31:261.
- Slavin MA, Osborne B, Adams R, et al. Efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis for fungal infections after marrow transplantation--a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Infect Dis 1995; 171:1545-1552.
- Marr KA, Seidel K, Slavin MA, et al. Prolonged fluconazole prophylaxis is associated with persistent protection against candidiasis-relatd death in allogeneic marrow transplant recipients: long-term follow-up of a randomized, placebo- controlled trial. Blood 2000; 96:2055-2061.
- Montesinos J, Sola C, Maroto P, et al. Fungal infections in patients with solid tumors treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2001 Aug; 20:569-572.
- Rotstein C, Bow EJ, Laverdiere M, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of fluconazole prophylaxis for neutropenic cancer patients: benefit based on purpose and intensity of cytotoxic therapy. The Canadian Fluconazole Prophylaxis Study Group. Clin Infect Dis 1999 Feb; 28:331-340.
- Walsh TJ, Roden M, Nelson L, et al. Invasive fungal infections complicating non- myeloablative allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). 42nd ICAAC Abstract # M-1233, San Diego, California, Sept. 27-30, 2002.
- Malik IA, Khan WA, Karim M, et al. Feasibility of outpatient management of fever in cancer patients with low-risk neutropenia: results of a prospective randomized trial. Am J Med 1995; 98:224-231.
- Garcia-Carbonero R, Cortes-Funes H. Outpatient therapy with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk neutropenia and fever: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Cancer 1999; 85:213-219.
- Rolston KVI. New trends in patient management: risk-based therapy for febrile patients with neutropenia. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29:515-521.
- Freifeld A, Marchigiani D, Walsh T, et al. A double-blind comparison of empirical oral and intravenous antibiotic therapy for low-risk febrile patients with neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:305-311.
|
|
|
©
Está
expresamente prohibida la redistribución y la redifusión de todo o parte de los
contenidos de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica (SIIC) S.A. sin
previo y expreso consentimiento de SIIC. |
|
| |