PROFILAXIS Y TRATAMIENTO DEL SINDROME DE DIFICULTAD RESPIRATORIA CON DIFERENTES PREPARADOS SURFACTANTES
|
(especial para SIIC © Derechos reservados) |
|
El tratamiento del síndrome de dificultad respiratoria (SDR) con surfactante exógeno es una estrategia de probada eficacia, aunque no existe ninguna razón científica que apoye el uso de los surfactantes sintéticos comercializados |
participó en la investigación
Lourdes Román Etxebarría*
Adjunto de Pediatría. Hospital de Cruces*
|
Resumen
Introducción. El tratamiento del síndrome de dificultad respiratoria (SDR) con surfactante exógeno es una estrategia de probada eficacia. Objetivo. Evaluar la evidencia existente comparando la eficacia de los diversos preparados tensioactivos en el tratamiento y profilaxis del SDR. Métodos. Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica pormenorizada en las diversas bases de datos existentes (Medline, Embase, etc.), para identificar todos los estudios comparativos entre los diversos preparados tensioactivos. Resultados. Existen datos que corroboran que los surfactantes naturales producen más rápida mejoría de la oxigenación en comparación con los sintéticos. También se ha observado menores tasas de complicaciones y de mortalidad con el empleo de surfactantes naturales. De los dos surfactantes naturales comercializados, el de origen porcino (poractant-α) parece presentar ventajas sobre los de origen bovino (beractant), por tener mayor rapidez de acción. Se observa también que los tratados con surfactante porcino tienden a presentar menor mortalidad global (3%) que los tratados con surfactante bovino (12.5%). Conclusión. No existe ninguna razón científica que apoye el uso de los surfactantes sintéticos comercializados. El surfactante natural de origen porcino (poractant-α) podría quizás ser considerado como de primera elección, si bien sería conveniente disponer de estudios adicionales que lo confirmaran como tal.
Palabras clave
Surfactante exógeno, síndrome de dificultad respiratoria.
Clasificación en siicsalud
Artículos originales> Expertos de Iberoamérica>
página www.siicsalud.com/des/des037/04401001.htm
Especialidades
Principal: Pediatría
Relacionadas: Cuidados Intensivos, Farmacología, Medicina Farmacéutica
Artículo completo (castellano)
Extensión:
+/- 8.12 páginas impresas en papel A4
Exclusivo para suscriptores/ assinantes |
PROPHYLAXIS AND TREATMENT OF RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME WITH DIFFERENT SURFACTANT PREPARATIONS
Abstract
Background. Treatment of RDS with exogenous surfactant has been shown very effective. However, is not clear if all surfactant preparations have the same efficacy.Aim. To evaluate if a particular surfactant preparation can be considered more effective than others in the prophylaxis and treatment of the RDS.Methods. A systematic bibliographic search has been performed in several databases to identify studies comparing any of these tensoactive preparations.Results. There is evidence that natural surfactants are more rapidly effective than the synthetic ones, and they might have lower complication and mortality rates. The porcine-derived surfactant might have some advantages over the bovine-derived beractant, with a faster action and a more favorable Pa/PAO2 ratio in the first 24 h of therapy. There is also a trend toward a lower mortality rate (3%) among those treated with porcine in comparison to those treated with bovine-derived surfactant (12.5%).Conclusion. Clinical use of the commercialised synthetic surfactants is not supported by evidence. There is no scientific reason to support its use nowadays. The porcine derived surfactant might be considered as the first therapeutic choice, although it should be useful to have more additional studies to confirm this fact.
Key words
Exogenous surfactant, respiratory distress syndrome.
Bibliografía del artículo
- Avery ME y Mead J. Surface properties in relation to the atelectasis and hyaline membrane disease. Am J Dis Child 1959;97:517-521
- Fujiwara T, Chida S, Watabe Y, Maeta H, Morita T, Abe T. Artificial surfactant therapy in hyaline membrane disease. Lancet 1980;1:64-68
- Halliday HL. Surfactant replacement. En: Year Book Neonatal Medicine 1991. Klaus MH, Fanaroff AA (Eds.), Mosby Year Book, St. Louis, EEUU, pp XIV-XXI
- Soll RF. Natural surfactant extract treatment of RDS. En: Sinclair JL et al (Eds.). Neonatal Module of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The Cochrane Collaboration. Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 1997
- Soll RF. Natural surfactant extract vs. synthetic surfactant in the treatment of established respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 2, 2002
- Halliday HL. Overview of clinical trials, comparing natural and synthetic surfactants. Biol Neonate 1995; 67(suppl):32-47
- Soll RF. Prophylactic surfactant vs. treatment with surfactant. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 2, 2002
- Egberts J, Brand R, Walti H, Bevilacqua G, Breart G, Gardini F. Mortality, severe respiratory distress syndrome and chronic lung disease of the newborn are reduced more after prophylactic than after therapeutic administration of the surfactant Curosurf. Pediatrics 1997 Jul; 100(1):e 4.
- Soll RF. Surfactant treatment of the very preterm infant. Biol Neonate 1998;74 (suppl 1):35-42
- Crowley P. Prophylactic corticosteroids for Preterm Birth. Neonatal Modulo of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The Cochrane Collaboration. Issue 4. Oxford: Update Software, 2002
- Jobe AH, Ikegami M. Biology of Surfactant. Clin Perinatol 2001;28:655-669
- Valls i Soler A, Fernandez-Ruanova B, López-Heredia J et al. on behalf of the Spanish Surfactant Collaborative Group. A randomized comparison of surfactant dosing via a dual-lumen endotracheal tube in respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics 1998; April 101, http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/101/4/e 4
- Zola EM, Gunkel JH, Chan RK, Lim MO, Knox I, Feldman BH et al. Comparison of three dosing procedures for administration of bovine surfactant to neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr 1993;122:453-459
- Cochrane CG, Revack SD. Pulmonary surfactant protein B (SP-B): structure-function relationships. Science1991;254:566-568
- Cochrane CG, Revack SD, Merrit TA, Heldty GP, Hallman M, Cunningham MD et al. The efficacy and safety of KL4-surfactant in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Casre Med 1996;153:404-410
- Da Costa DE, Pai MGK, Al Khusaiby SM. Comparative trial of artificial and natural surfactants in the treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome of prematurity: experiences in a developing country. Pediatr Pulmonol 1999;27:312-317
- Malathi I. Differences in immediate and short-term outcome of premature neonates treated with two types of exogenous surfactant preparation. Ann Acod Med Singapore 1995;24:781-784
- Kresch MJ, Jonathan MC. Meta-Analyses of surfactant replacement therapy of infants with birth weight less than 2000 g. J Perinatol 1998;8:276-283
- Halliday HL. Natural vs. synthetic surfactants in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Drugs 1996;51:226-237
- Halliday HL. Synthetic or natural surfactants. Acta Paediatr 1997;86:233-237
- Ainsworth SB, Beresford M, Milligan DW, Shaw NJ, Matthews JN, Fenton AC, Ward MP. Pumactant and poractant-α for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in neonates born at 25-29 weeks´ gestation: a randomised trial. The Lancet 2000;355:1387-1392
- Speer CP, Gefeller O, Groneck P, Laufkötter E, Roll C, Hanssler L, Harms K, Herting E, Boenisch H, Windeler J, Robertson B. Randomised clinical trial of two treatment regimens of natural surfactant preparations in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Dis Child 1995;72:F8-F13
- Marco Rived A, Marco Tello A, Martínez Martínez JM, Beltran Cruxells JJ, Rebaje Moise V, Rite Montañes S; Romo Montejo A. Tratamiento del SDRI con diferentes tipos de surfactante exógeno, estudio comparativo. An Esp Pediatr 1995;73:46
- Hudak ML. A multicenter, randomized, masked comparation trial of natural versus synthetic surfactant for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr 1996;128:396-406
- Nohara K, Berggren P, Curstedt T, Grossman G, Nilsson R, Robertson B. Correlations between physical and physiological properties of various preparations of lung surfactant. Eur J Respir Dis 1986;69:321-335
- Sinha S, Valls i Soler A, Lacaze-Masmonteil T, Gradzinowski J, Sanchez_lUna M, et al. KL4-peptide surfactant (Surfaxin) vs. Curosurf for prevention of RDS in very preterm babies. Pediatr Res 2003;54:587A
|
|
|
©
Está
expresamente prohibida la redistribución y la redifusión de todo o parte de los
contenidos de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica (SIIC) S.A. sin
previo y expreso consentimiento de SIIC. |
|
|