siiclogo2c.gif (4671 bytes)


       

            


Comprar este artículo
Extensión: 14.3 páginas impresas en papel A4

file05.gif (1491 bytes)
Artículos seleccionados para su compra

ESTUDO COMPARATIVO DA EFICÂCIA DO ETANOL E ÁCIDO L-GLUTÂMICO NA PREVENÇÃO DA CALCIFICAÇÃO DAS CÚSPIDES E PAREDE AÓRTICA PORCINA. ESTUDO EXPERIMENTAL EM RATOS

(especial para SIIC © Derechos reservados)

Concluiu-se que o pré-tratamento com etanol a 80% inibiu a calcificação nas cúspides aórticas porcinas, entretanto não teve a mesma eficácia na parede aórtica
George Ronald Soncini da Rosa Autor:
George Ronald Soncini da Rosa
Columnista Experto de SIIC

Institución:
Departamento de posGarduación en Clínica Quirúrgica Hospital de Clínicas Universidad Federal do Paraná

Artículos publicados por George Ronald Soncini da Rosa 
participó en la investigación
Francisco Diniz Affonso Da Costa*
Doutor em Clínica Cirúrgica pela Universidade Federal do Paraná; Professor Adjunto em Técnica operatória no curso de Medicina PUC-PR; Membro titular pela Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascula*

Recepción del artículo: 31 de Enero, 2005

Aprobación: 22 de Febrero, 2005

Primera edición: 30 de Agosto, 2005

Resumen
Introdução: As cúspides porcinas tratadas com glutaraldeído (GDA) são um dos tecidos biológicos mais utilizados em biopróteses, porém a calcificação tardia pós-implante constitui a causa predominante de sua falência. Objetivo: Analisar comparativamente dois métodos de prevenção da calcificação (etanol 80% e ácido L-glutâmico 0.8%) em cúspide e parede aórtica porcina implantadas no subcutâneo em ratos, tendo como grupo controle as cúspides e os segmentos de parede aórtica fixadas em glutaraldeído (GDA), num período de 15, 30 e 60 dias após implante. Métodos: Foram utilizados 45 ratos jovens, distribuídos em 3 grupos contendo 15 animais cada, que por sua vez foram subdivididos em 3 subgrupos de 5 animais, nos quais foram implantados, em 2 bolsas no subcutâneo, uma cúspide e um segmento de parede aórtica em cada. Em cada grupo assim nominados: GDA (grupo controle), E80% (grupo cuja as estruturas foram pré-tratadas com etanol 80%) e o AG 0.8% (grupo cuja as estruturas foram pré-tratadas com ácido L-glutâmico 0.8%) foram realizadas a mensuração do cálcio e análise microscópica quanto à presença de calcificação: localização e intensidade da mesma; Infiltrado inflamatório: localização e tipo, no período de 15, 30 e 60 dias após implante. Resultados: Na mensuração do cálcio na cúspide aórtica encontrou-se no grupo E80% 15 dias (1.30 ± 0.21 μg cálcio/mg tecido), E80% 30 dias (1.05 ± 0.22 μg cálcio/mg tecido) e E80% 60 dias (0.53 ± 0.42 μg cálcio/mg tecido); no grupo AG 0.8% 15 dias (12.17 ± 0.66 μg cálcio/mg tecido), AG 0.8% 30 dias (15.31 ± 2.82 μg cálcio/mg tecido) e AG 0.8% 60 dias (34.24 ± 16.28 μg cálcio/mg tecido) com o grupo controle GDA 15 dias (12.44 ± 2.26 μg cálcio/mg tecido), GDA 30 dias (13.44 ± 3.34 μg cálcio/mg tecido) e GDA 60 dias (50.85 ± 8.71 μg cálcio/mg tecido). Em relação à mensuração do cálcio na parede aórtica, encontrou-se no grupo de E80% 15 dias (4.62 ± 0.68 μg cálcio/ mg tecido), E80% 30 dias (9.47 ± 2.59 μg cálcio/mg tecido) e E80% 60 dias (23.56 ± 7.75 μg cálcio/mg tecido) no grupo de AG 0.8% 15 dias (4.31 ± 0.85 μg cálcio/mg tecido), AG 0.8% 30 dias (7.69 ± 1.48 μg cálcio/mg tecido) e AG 0.8% 60 dias (20.50 ± 1.22 μg cálcio/mg tecido) com o grupo controle GDA 15 dias (7.34 ± 1.32 μg cálcio/mg tecido), GDA 30 dias (9.28 ± 0.76 μg cálcio/mg tecido) e GDA 60 dias (27.60 ± 1.08 μg cálcio/mg tecido). Na avaliação microscópica da cúspide aórtica houve uma progressiva calcificação naquelas submetidas a fixação com GDA. Esse processo foi parcialmente encontrado com o AG 0.8% e totalmente ausente com o E80%. Quanto à avaliação referente aos segmentos da parede aórtica, também evidenciou-se progressiva calcificação, não sendo inibidas pelos tratamentos com AG 0.8% e E80%. Conclusões: Concluiu-se que o pré-tratamento com etanol a 80% inibiu a calcificação nas cúspides aórticas porcinas, entretanto não teve a mesma eficácia na parede aórtica. Contudo, o ácido L-glutâmico a 0.8% demonstrou minimizar a calcificação na parede aórtica. Estudos devem ser feitos para evidenciar se a ação anticalcificante do etanol a 80% mantém-se em as biopróteses aórticas porcinas forem implantadas no sistema circulatório.

Palabras clave
Cúspide porcina, etanol, calcificação, parede aórtica porcina, ácido L-glutâmico

Clasificación en siicsalud
Artículos originales> Expertos de Iberoamérica>
página www.siicsalud.com/des/des044/05816038.htm

Especialidades
Principal: Cardiología
Relacionadas: Medicina Interna

Patrocinio y reconocimiento
Trabalho realizado no Departamento de Cirurgia Experimental da Disciplina de Técnica Operatória da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR), Curitiba, PR, Brasil
Artículo completo
(portugués)
Extensión:  +/- 14.3 páginas impresas en papel A4
Exclusivo para suscriptores/ assinantes

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EFFICACY OF ETHANOL AND L-GLUTAMIC ACID FOR PREVENTING CALCIFICATION OF PIG CUSPS AND AORTIC WALL. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY IN RATS

Abstract
Introduction: The glutataldehyde (GDA) treated pigs cusps are one of most employed tissues in bioprothesis, but its late post-implant calcification is the main cause of its failure. Background: This study aims at comparing and analyzing two methods (ethanol 80% and l-glutamic acid 0.8%) to prevent calcification in pig cusps and aortic wall implanted subcutaneously in rats, the cusps and aortic wall segments of the controls were fixed with glutaraldehyde (GDA), during a 15, 30 and 60 days after the implant. Material and Methods: We used 45 young rats, distributed in 3 groups of 15 rats each, which were subdivided in 3 subgroups of 5 rats each, in which we implanted one cusp and one aortic wall segment in 2 subcutaneous pouches for each rat. We called each group as follows: GDA (control group), E80% (the group whose structures were previously prepared with ethanol 80%) and GA 0.8% (group previously prepared with L-glutamic acid 0.8%); in those groups we measured calcium and performed a microscopic analysis seeking for any calcification, its location and intensity; inflammatory infiltrate, location and type, during a 15, 30. and 60-day period after the implant. Results: Calcium was found in the aortic cusp in the E80% group (1.30 ± 0.21 μg calcium/mg tissue) at day 15, (1.05 ± 0.22 μg calcium/mg tissue) at day 30. and (0.53 ± 0.42 μg calcium/mg tissue) at day 60; in the GA 0.8% group (12.17 ± 0.66 μg calcium/mg tissue) at day 15, (15.31 ± 2.82 μg calcium/mg tissue) at day 30. and (34.24 ± 16.28 μg calcium/mg tissue) at day 60; and in the control group, GDA at day 15 (12.44 ± 2.26 μg calcium/mg tissue), at day 30 (13.44 ± 3.34 μg calcium/mg tissue), and at day 60 (50.85 ± 8.71 μg calcium/mg tissue). As for the calcium measured in the aortic wall, in the E80% group we found (4.62 ± 0.68 μg calcium/mg tissue) at day 15, (9.47 ± 2.59 μg calcium/mg tissue) at day 30. and (23.56 ± 7.75 μg calcium/mg tissue) at day 60; in the GA 0.8% group at day 15 (4.31 ± 0.85 μg calcium/mg tissue), at day 30 (7.69 ± 1.48 μg calcium/mg tissue), and at day 60 (20.50 ± 1.22 μg calcium/mg tissue); and in the control group (GDA) at day 15 (7.34 ± 1.32 μg calcium/mg tissue), at day 30 (9.28 ± 0.76 μg calcium/mg tissue), at day 60 (27.60 ± 1.08 μg calcium/mg tissue). Microscopic evaluation of the aortic cusp, showed a progressive calcification in those fixed with GDA. Such process was found partially in the GA 0.8% group, and totally absent in the E80% group. As for the assessment of the aortic wall segments, we also observed progressive calcification, which was not inhibited by the treatment with either GA 0.8% or E80%. Conclusions: We concluded that a pre-treatment with ethanol at 80% inhibited calcification in pig aortic cusps, however it was not as effective on the aortic wall. However, L-glutamic acid at 0.8% did show that it minimizes calcification in the aortic wall. Further studies are required, to demonstrate if the anti-calcifying action of ethanol at 80% is kept if the pig aortic bioprostheses are implanted in the circulatory system.


Key words
Descriptors: pig aortic cusp, calcification, ethanol, pig aortic wall, l-glutamic acid

Bibliografía del artículo

  1. Schoen FJ, Levy RJ. Current challenges and future research perpectives. Founder’s Award, 25th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, Providence, RI, April 28-May 2, 1999. Tissue Heart Valves: 1999; 439-465.
  2. Cosgrove DM. Valve reconstruction versus valve replacement. In: Current hearth valve prostheses. In: Crawford FA ed. Cardiac Surgery. 1987; 143 p.
  3. Gott JP et al. Calcification of porcine valves: a successful new method of antimineralization. Ann Thorac Surg, 1992; 53:207-216.
  4. Ross D. Homograft replacement of the aortic valve. Lancet, 1962; 2:487.
  5. Ionescu MI, Wooler GH, Smith DR, Grinshaw VA. Mitral valve replacement with aortic heterografts in humans. Thorax, 1967; 22:305-313.
  6. Braile DM et al. Experiência inicial com emprego das próteses de Lillehei-Kaster. Arq Bras Cardiol, 1974; 27 (supl. 1):14.
  7. Puig LB, Verginelli G. Válvulas cardíacas de dura-máter homóloga. Nota prévia. R Paul Med, 1971; 78:33–35.
  8. Potkin BN et al. Bioprostheses in tricuspid and mitral valve positions for 95 months with heavier calcific deposits on the right-sided valve. Am J Cardiol, 1988; 61:947-949.
  9. Carpentier A et al. Remplancement des valvules mitraes et ki cuspides per le’tirogreffes. Ann Clin Thorac Cardiovasc, 1968; 7:33-38.
  10. Pelletier L et al. Porcine versus pericardial bioprotheses: a comparision of late results in 1,593 patients. Ann Thorac Surg, 1989; 47:352-361.
  11. Barratt-Boyes BG. Homograft aortic valve replacement in aortic incompetence and stenosis. Thorax, 1964; 19:131.
  12. Carpentier A et al. Six-year follow-up of glutaraldehyde-preserved heterografts: with particular reference to the treatment of congenital valve malformations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1974; 68:771-782.
  13. Carpentier A et al. Techniques for prevention of calcification of valvular bioprostheses. Circulation, 1984; 70 (suppl 1):165-168.
  14. Aupart RM et al. The last generation of pericardial valves in the aortic position. Ann Thorac Surg, 1996; 6:615-620.
  15. Jamieson WR et al. Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to seventeen years. Ann Thorac Surg, 1995; 60:999-1007.
  16. Scheld HH, Konertz W. The pathology of bioprosthetic heart valves and allografts. Curr Top Pathol, 1994; 86:87-125.
  17. Grunkemeier GL, Bodnar E. Comparative assessment of bioprosthesis durability in the aortic position. J Hearth Valve Dis, 1995; 4:49-55.
  18. Vyavahare N et al. Prevention of bioprosthetic heart valve calcification by ethanol preincubation: efficacy and mechanisms. Circulation, 1997; 95:479-488.
  19. Lee CH et al. Inhibition of aortic wall calcification in bioprosthetic hearth valves by ethanol pretreatment: Biochemical and biophysical mechanism. J Biomed Mater Res, 1998; 42:30-37.
  20. Vyavahare NR et al. Prevention of glutaraldehyde - fixed bioprosthetic heart valve calcification by alcohol pretreatment: further mechanistic studies. J of Heart Valve Disease, 2000; 9:561-566.
  21. Shen M et al. Effect of ethanol and ether in the prevention of calcification of bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg, 2001; 71:413-416.
  22. Schoen FJ et al. Biomaterial-associated calcification: pathology, mechanisms, and strategies for prevention. J Biomed Mater Res, 1988; 22:11-36.
  23. Golomb G et al. The role of glutaraldehyde - induced cros-links in calcification of bovine pericardium used in cardiac valve bioprotheses. Am J Pathol, 1987; 127:122-130.
  24. Grimm M, Eybl E, Grabenwoger M. Biocompatibility of aldehyde - fixed bovine pericardium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1991; 102:195-201.
  25. Grabenwoger M et al. Decreased tissue reaction to bioprosthetic heart valve material after L-glutamic acid treatment: a morphological study. J Biomed Mater Res, 1992; 26:1231-1240.
  26. Carpentier A et al. Biological factors affecting long-term results of valvular hetero-grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1969; 58:467-483.
  27. Grunkemeier GL et al. Actuarial versus actual risk of porcine structural valve deterioration. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1994; 108:709-718.
  28. Milano A et al. Valve-related complications in eldery patients with biological and mechanical aortic valves. Ann Thorac Surg, 1998; 66:S82-S87.
  29. Hirsch D et al. Synergistic inhibition of the calcification of glutaraldehyde pretreated bovine pericardium in rat a subdermal model by FeCI3 and ethanehydroxydisphosphonate: preincubation and polymeric controlled release studies. Biomaterials, 1993; 14:705-711.
  30. Jones M et al. The effects of anticalcification treatments on bioprosthetic heart valves implanted in sheep. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs, 1988; 34:1027-1030.
  31. Chen W, Schoen FJ, Levy RJ. Mechanism of efficacy of 2-amino oleic acid for inhibition of calcification of glutaraldehyde-pretreated porcine bioprosthetic heart valves. Circulation, 1994a; 90:323-329.
  32. Chen W, Kim JD, Schoen FJ, Levy RJ. Effect of 2-amino oleic acid exposure conditions on the inhibition of calcification of glutaraldehyde crosslinked porcine aortic valves. J Biomed Mater Res, 1994b; 28:1485-1495.
  33. Hirsch D et al. Inhibition of calcification of glutaraldehyde pretreated porcine aortic valve cusps with sodium dodecyl sulfate: preincubation and controlled release studies. J Biomed Mater Res, 1993; 27:1477-1484.
  34. Levy RJ, Schoen FJ, Lund SA, Smith MS. Prevention of leaflet calcification of bioprosthetic heart valves with diphosphonate injection therapy: experimental studies of optimal dosages and therapeutic durations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1987; 94:551-557.
  35. Levy RJ et al. Inhibition of calcification of bioprosthetic heart valves by local controlled-released diphosphonate. Science, 1985; 228:190-192.
  36. Vyavahare N et al. Synergism of calcium-ethanehydroxybisphosphonate (CaEHBP) and FeCL3: controlled release polymers for preventing calcification of bioprosthetic aortic. J Control Rel, 1995; 34:34-97.
  37. Webb CL, Schoen FJ, Levy RJ - Covalent binding of aminopropanehydroxydisphosphonate to glutaraldehyde residues in pericardial bioprosthetic tissue. Exp Mol Pathol, 1989; 50:291-302.
  38. Jones M et al. Anticalcification treatments of bioprosthetic heart valves: in vivo studies in sheep. J Cardiac Surg, 1989; 4:69-73.
  39. Golomb G, Ezra V. Prevention of bioprosthetic heart valve tissue calcification by charge modification: effects of protamine binding by formaldehyde. J Biomed Mat Res, 1991; 15:85-98.
  40. Schoen FJ, Levy RJ. Pathophysiology of bioprosthetic heart valve calcification. In: Bodnar, E. Yacoub, M.H. ed. Biological and bioprosthetic valves. New York: 1986. 418-429p.
  41. Schoen FJ, Hirsch D, Bianco RW, Levy RJ. Onset and progression of calcification in porcine aortic bioprosthetic valves implanted as orthotopic mitral valve replacements in juvenile sheep. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1994; 108:880-887.
  42. Weissenstein C, Human P, Bezuidenhout D, Zilla P. Glutaraldehyde detoxification in addition to enhanced amine cross-linking dramatically reduces bioprosthetic tissue calcification in the rat model. J Heart Valve Dis, 2000; 9:230-240.
Título portugues/
Resumen
 Palabras clave
 Bibliografía
 Artículo completo
(exclusivo suscriptores)
 Autoevaluación
 Tema principal en SIIC Data Base
 Especialidades

 English title
 Abstract

 Key words

Autor 
Artículos
Correspondencia

Patrocinio

Imprimir esta página

 

Clasificado en 
Artículos originales>
Expertos de Iberoamérica

Especialidad principal:
Cardiología
 
Relacionadas: 
 Medicina Interna

 

Suscripción a siicsalud

Comprar este artículo
Extensión: ± 14.3 páginas impresas en papel A4

file05.gif (1491 bytes) Artículos seleccionados para su compra

 


© Está expresamente prohibida la redistribución y la redifusión de todo o parte de los contenidos de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica (SIIC) S.A. sin previo y expreso consentimiento de SIIC.

anterior.gif (1015 bytes)



Suscripción a siicsalud

Bienvenidos a siicsalud

Acerca de SIIC Estructura de SIIC


Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica (SIIC)
Av. Belgrano 430, (C1092AAR), Buenos Aires, Argentina
atencionallector@siicsalud.com;  Tel: +54 11 4342-4901; Fax: +54 11 4331-3305.
Casilla de Correo 2568, (C1000WAZ) Correo Central, Buenos Aires.
Copyright siicsalud© 1997- 2006, Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica(SIIC)