Authors' Reports

Artículos relacionadosArtículos relacionadosArtículos relacionados
Artículos afines de siicsalud publicados en los últimos 4 meses
SALUD BUCAL MATERNA, PARTOS PREMATUROS Y BAJO PESO AL NACER
Gaceta Médica de Caracas 131(2):268-277
Difundido en siicsalud: 22 feb 2024
FETO PEQUEÑO PARA LA EDAD GESTACIONAL Y DOPPLER DE ARTERIA UTERINA
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 23(659):1-16
Difundido en siicsalud: 5 feb 2024
Ambrogio P Londero
describes for SIIC the most significant aspects of his article
describe para SIIC los aspectos relevantes de su artículo


A brief summary about predictive factors for breech presentation

Advanced maternal age, early gestational age, low neonatal weight, female gender, nulliparity, previous cesarean section, tobacco smoke, decreased volume of amniotic fluid, fundal placenta position, parents themselves delivered in breech presentation, congenital malformation, and low PAPP-A values at first trimester screening resulted to be risk factors for fetal breech presentation at delivery.

The article was published by
El artículo fue publicado por
Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Volume / Volumen: 27
Number / Número: 1-2
First and last pages / Páginas inicial-final: 167-172
Year / Año: 2014
Month / Mes: february


This journal, which is covered by SIIC Data Bases,
is part of the bibliographic collections of the Biblioteca Biomédica (BB) SIIC.
Esta revista, clasificada por SIIC Data Bases,
integra el acervo bibliográfico de la Biblioteca Biomédica (BB) SIIC.
icopagok.gif



Principal institution where the research took place
Institución principal de la investigación
Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, DISM, University of Udine, Udine, UD, Italy


a-livro3.gif
Authors' Report

Crónica del Autor
Print

Bibliographic references
Referencias bibliográficas

[1]Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gülmezoglu AM, Souza JP, Taneepanichskul S, Ruyan P, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet. 2010 Feb;375(9713):490–499. [2]Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Dalaker K, Irgens LM. The occurrence of breech presentation in Norway 1967-1994. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998 Apr;77(4):410–415. [3]Signorelli C, Cattaruzza MS, Osborn JF. Risk factors for caesarean section in Italy: results of a multicentre study. Public Health. 1995 May;109(3):191–199. [4]Hill LM. Prevalence of breech presentation by gestational age. Am J Perinatol. 1990 Jan;7(1):92–93. [5]Vranjes M, Habek D. Perinatal outcome in breech presentation depending on the mode of vaginal delivery. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2008;23(1):54–59. [6]Lee HC, El-Sayed YY, Gould JB. Population trends in cesarean delivery for breech presentation in the United States, 1997-2003. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul;199(1):59.e1–59.e8. [7]Ghosh MK. Breech presentation: evolution of management. J Reprod Med. 2005 Feb;50(2):108–116. [8]Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD000166. [9]Reddin PC. Changing management of breech presentation. Mo Med. 1974 Oct;71(10):584–586. [10]Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hodnett ED, Chalmers B, Kung R, Willan A, et al. Outcomes at 3 months after planned cesarean vs planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. JAMA. 2002 Apr;287(14):1822–1831. [11]Stuart IP. Term breech trial. Lancet. 2001 Jan;357(9251):228. [12]Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000 Oct;356(9239):1375–1383. [13]Fawole AO, Adeyemi AS, Adewole IF, Omigbodun AO. A ten-year review of breech deliveries at Ibadan. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2001;30(1-2):87–90. [14]Roberts CL, Algert CS, Peat B, Henderson-Smart D. Small fetal size: a risk factor for breech birth at term. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999 Oct;67(1):1–8. [15]Rayl J, Gibson PJ, Hickok DE. A population-based case-control study of risk factors for breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan;174(1 Pt 1):28–32. [16]Cammu H, Dony N, Martens G, Colman R. Common determinants of breech presentation at birth in singletons: a population-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Jun;177:106–109. [17]Fruscalzo A, Londero AP, Salvador S, Bertozzi S, Biasioli A, Della Martina M, et al. New and old predictive factors for breech presentation: our experience in 14433 singleton pregnancies and a literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Jan;27(2):167–172. [18]Kalogiannidis I, Masouridou N, Dagklis T, Masoura S, Goutzioulis M, Prapas Y, et al. Previous cesarean section increases the risk for breech presentation at term pregnancy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2010;37(1):29–32. [19]Nordtveit TI, Melve KK, Albrechtsen S, Skjaerven R. Maternal and paternal contribution to intergenerational recurrence of breech delivery: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2008 Apr;336(7649):872–876. [20]Vendittelli F, Rivière O, Crenn-Hébert C, Rozan MA, Maria B, Jacquetin B, et al. Is a breech presentation at term more frequent in women with a history of cesarean delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):521.e1–521.e6. [21]Witkop CT, Zhang J, Sun W, Troendle J. Natural history of fetal position during pregnancy and risk of nonvertex delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;111(4):875–880.
[22]Choudhury AP, Dawson AJ. Trends in indications for caesarean sections over 7 years in a Welsh district general hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Nov;29(8):714–717. [23]Londero AP, Salvador S, Fruscalzo A, Bertozzi S, Biasioli A, Ceraudo M, et al. First trimester PAPP-A MoM values predictive for breech presentation at term of pregnancy. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013 May;29(5):503–507. [24]Londero AP, Bertozzi S, Visentin S, Fruscalzo A, Driul L, Marchesoni D. High placental index and poor pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective study of 18,386 pregnancies. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013 Jul;29(7):666–669. [25]Fox AJS, Chapman MG. Longitudinal ultrasound assessment of fetal presentation: a review of 1010 consecutive cases. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Aug;46(4):341–344. [26]Burgos J, Melchor JC, Pijoán JI, Cobos P, Fernández-Llebrez L, Martínez-Astorquiza T. A prospective study of the factors associated with the success rate of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Sep;112(1):48–51. [27]Collins S, Ellaway P, Harrington D, Pandit M, Impey LWM. The complications of external cephalic version: results from 805 consecutive attempts. BJOG. 2007 May;114(5):636–638. [28]Hutton EK, Saunders CA, Tu M, Stoll K, Berkowitz J, Group EECVTC. Factors associated with a successful external cephalic version in the early ECV trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008 Jan;30(1):23–28. [29]Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, van der Post J, Opmeer B, Mol BW. Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;199(6):630.e1–7; discussion e1–5. [30]Jolly M, Sebire N, Harris J, Robinson S, Regan L. The risks associated with pregnancy in women aged 35 years or older. Hum Reprod. 2000 Nov;15(11):2433–2437. [31]Ezra Y, McParland P, Farine D. High delivery intervention rates in nulliparous women over age 35. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995 Oct;62(2):203–207. [32]Rietberg CCT, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Brand R, van Loon AJ, Hemel OJSV, Visser GHA. Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33824 infants. BJOG. 2003 Jun;110(6):604–609. [33]Getahun D, Strickland D, Lawrence JM, Fassett MJ, Koebnick C, Jacobsen SJ. Racial and ethnic disparities in the trends in primary cesarean delivery based on indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;201(4):422.e1–422.e7. [34]Ridley M. Genome: The autobiography of a species in 23 chapters. HarperCollins Publishers; 2000. [35]Dawkins R. The selfish gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1976. [36]McGrath J, Solter D. Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell. 1984 May;37(1):179–183.

Other articles written by the author Ambrogio P Londero
Otros artículos de Ambrogio P Londero

Londero AP, Orsaria M, Grassi T, Calcagno A, Marzinotto S, Ceraudo M, Fruscalzo A, Driul L, Mariuzzi L. Placental hCG immunohistochemistry and serum free-Beta-hCG at 11-13 weeks' gestation in intrauterine fetal demise. Histochem Cell Biol 139(4):595-603, 2013.
Londero AP, Orsaria M, Tell, G, Marzinotto, S, Capodicasa V, Poletto M, Vascotto C, Sacco C, Mariuzzi L. Expression and prognostic significance of APE1/Ref-1 and NPM1 proteins in high-grade ovarian serous cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 141(3):404-414, 2014.
Londero AP, Salvador S, Fruscalzo A, Bertozzi S, Biasioli A, Ceraudo M, Visentin S, Driul L, Marchesoni D. First trimester PAPP-A MoM values predictive for breech presentation at term of pregnancy. Gynecol Endocrinol 29(5):503-507, 2013.
Bernardi S, Bertozzi S, Londero AP, Gentile G, Giacomuzzi F, Carbone A. Incidence and risk factors of the intraoperative localization failure of nonpalpable breast lesions by radio-guided occult lesion localization: A retrospective analysis of 579 cases. World J Surg 36(8):1915-1921, 2012.
Bernardi S, Bertozzi S, Londero AP, Giacomuzzi F, Angione V, Dri C, Carbone A, Petri R. Nine years of experience with the sentinel lymph node biopsy in a single Italian center: A retrospective analysis of 1,050 cases. World J Surg 36(4):714-722, 2012.
Calcagno A, Grassi T, Mariuzzi L, Marzinotto S, Londero AP, Orsaria M, Beltrami CA, Marchesoni D. Expression patterns of Aurora A and B kinases, Ki-67 and the estrogen and progesterone receptors determined using an endometriosis tissue microarray model. Hum Reprod 26(10):2731-2741, 2011.
Cedolini C, Bertozzi S, Londero AP, Bernardi S, Seriau L, Concina S, Cattin F, Risaliti A. Type of breast cancer diagnosis, screening, and survival. Clin Breast Cancer, 2014.
Cedolini C, Bertozzi S, Seriau L, Londero AP, Concina S, Moretti E, Padovani R, Pasqualucci A, Ceschia T, Risaliti A. Feasibility of concervative breast surgery and intraoperative radiation therapy for early breast cancer: A single-center, open, non-randomized, prospective pilot study. Oncol Rep 31(4):1539-1546, 2014.
Fruscalzo A, Londero AP, Fröhlich C, Meyer-Wittkopf M, Schmitz R. Quantitative elastography of the cervix for predicting labor induction success. Ultraschall Med, 2014.
Fruscalzo A, Schmitz R, Klockenbusch W, Köhler G, Londero AP, Siwetz M, Huppertz B. Human placental transthyretin in fetal growth restriction in combination with preeclampsia and the HELLP syndrome. Histochem Cell Biol 138(6):925-932, 2012.




SIIC System of Assisted Editing (SSEA)
/ Sistema SIIC de Edición Asistida (SSEA)

Ambrogio P Londero was invited by SIIC on
Ambrogio P Londero fue invitado por SIIC el
2014, may 9
  The authors' report was accepted on
La crónica del autor fue aprobada el
2023, june 21
The authors' report was accepted on
La crónica del autor fue aprobada el
2023, june 21
Published in siicsalud
Publicado en siicsalud
2023, september 19





The article is strictly related to the following sections of siicsalud
El artículo se relaciona estrictamente con las siguientes secciones de siicsalud

 
Surgery
/ Cirugía
 
Gynaecology and Obstetrics
/ Obstetricia y Ginecología
 

and secondarily related to the following sections

y secundariamente con las siguientes secciones

Anatomo-Pathology
Anatomía Patológica

Epidemiology
Epidemiología

Oncology
Oncología

Information about the full text
Acerca del trabajo completo


New and Old Predictive Factors for Breech Presentation: Our Experience in 14 433 Singleton Pregnancies and a Literature Review


Author / Autor
Ambrogio P Londero1, Arrigo Fruscalzo2, Serena Bertozzi3, Diego Marchesoni4, Lorenza Driul5

5 Md, Clinic Of Obstetrics And Gynecology, Dism, University Of Udine, Piazzale Santa Maria Della Misericordia 15, 33100 Udine (italy), Perinatal Medicine Specialist - Research


Access to the original source
Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine

Article URL:
/ URL del artículo:
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/14767058.asp

URL of Abstract:
/ URL del abstract:
/dato/resiic.php/173808

URL of Abstract page in Medline:
/ URL del abstract en Medline:
/dato/resiic.php/173808

URL of Abstract page in Scielo:
/ URL del abstract en Scielo:
/dato/resiic.php/173808

URL of Abstract page in Scopus:
/ URL del abstract en Scopus:
/dato/resiic.php/173808

URL of Abstract page in Embase:
/ URL del abstract en Embase:
/dato/resiic.php/173808

Other data bases:
/ Otras bases de datos:
/dato/resiic.php/173808

siic DB:
/ siic DB:
http://www.siicsalud.com/main/distriprinrel.php
Artículos relacionadosMás relacionadosArtículos relacionados
FACTORES ASOCIADOS CON LA NECESIDAD DE TERAPIA CON INSULINA EN LA DIABETES GESTACIONAL
Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología 74(2):136-142
Difundido en siicsalud: 24 nov 2023
ua32218