Conceptos Categóricos

Crónicas de autores

M Baeza *

Autor invitado por SIIC

El trabajo contribuye a analizar la necesidad de dilatación pupilar en el cribado de retinopatia diabetica

EVALUACIÓN DE ESTRATEGIAS (CON O SIN DILATACION ) PARA EL CRIBADO DE RETINOPATIA DIABETICA

El cribado de retinopatía diabética con cámara no midriática se puede realizar de forma eficaz analizando un solo campo retiniano pero precisa dilatación pupilar con tropicamida 0.5%. De no dilatar un 18% de las imágenes no son válidas.

*M Baeza
describe para SIIC los aspectos relevantes de su trabajo
SCREENING FOR SIGHT THREATENING DIABETIC RETINOPATHY USING NON-MYDRIATIC RETINAL CAMERA IN A PRIMARY CARE SETTING: TO DILATE OR NOT TO DILATE?
International Journal of Clinical Practice,
63(3):433-438 Mar, 2009

Esta revista, clasificada por SIIC Data Bases, integra el acervo bibliográfico
de la Biblioteca Biomédica (BB) SIIC.

Institución principal de la investigación
*University Miguel Hernandez, Alicante, España
Imprimir nota
Referencias bibliográficas
1 Watkins PJ. ABC of diabetes: retinopathy. BMJ 2003; 326: 924–6.

2 Early Treatment Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic colour fundus photographs –
an extension of the modified Airlie House classification: ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology 1991; 98 (Suppl.): 786–806.

3 Taylor CR, Merin LM, Salunga AM et al. Improving diabetic retinopathy screening ratios using telemedicine-based digital retinal
imaging technology: the Vine Hill study. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 574–8.

4 Stellingwerf C, Hardus PL, Hooymans JM. Two-field photography can identify patients with vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy: a screening approach in the primary care setting. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 2086–90.

5 Klein R, Klein BE. Screening for diabetic retinopathy, revisited. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 134: 261–3.

6 Perrier M, Boucher MC, Angioi K, Gresset JA, Olivier S. Comparison of two, three and four 45 degrees image fields obtained with the Topcon CRW6 nonmydriatic camera for screening for diabetic retinopathy. Can J Ophthalmol 2003; 38: 569–74.

7 Chew EY. Screening options for diabetic retinopathy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006; 17: 519–22. Review. 8 Liew G. Fundoscopy: to dilate or not to dilate? BMJ 2006; 332: 3.

9 Pandit RJ, Taylor R. Mydriasis and glaucoma: exploding the myth. A systematic review. Diabet Med 2000; 17: 693–9.

10 Wilson JM, Jungner YG. Principles and practice of mass screening for disease. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam 1968; 65: 281–393.

11 Gibbins RL, Owens DR, Allen JC, Eastman L. Practical application of the European Field Guide in screening for diabetic retinopathy by using ophthalmoscopy and 35 mm retinal slides. Diabetologia 1998; 41: 59–64.

12 World Health Organization ⁄ International Diabetes Foundation Europe. Diabetes care and research in Europe: the Saint Vincent declaration. Diabet Med 1990; 7: 360–4.

13 Kohner EM, Porta M. Protocols for screening and treatment of diabetic retinopathy in Europe. Eur J Ophthalmol 1990; 1: 45–54.

14 Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. III. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102: 527–32.

15 Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. X. Four year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 years or more. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 244– 9.

16 Van Herick W, Shaffer RN, Schwartz A. Stimation of width of angle of anterior chamber. Incidence and significance of the narrow angle. Am J Ophthalmol 1969; 68: 626.

17 Sa´nchez J, Ferna´ndez-Vigo J, Dı´az A et al. Prevalencia de la retinopatı ´a diabe´tica en una poblacio´n diabe´tica no seleccionada. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 1990; 59: 277–84.

18 Harding SP, Broadbent DM, Neoh C, White MC, Vora J. Sensitivity and specificity of photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for sight threatening eye disease: the Liverpool Diabetic Eye Study. Br Med J 1995; 311: 1131–5.

19 Taylor R. Practical community screening for diabetic retinopathy using the mobile retinal camera: report of a 12 centre study. Diabet Med 1996; 13: 946–52.

20 Moller F, Hansen M, Sjolie AK. Is one 60º fundus photograph sufficient for screening of proliferative diabetic retinopathy? Diabetes Care 2002; 24: 2083–5.

21 Verhoeven S, Ballegooie E, Crijns H, Hylkema HA, Loeve AA, Casparie AF. Is fundusfotografie zinvol bij de screening op diabetische retinopathie bij patienten met diabetes mellitus type II? Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1993; 137: 1713–7.

22 Herbert H, Jordan K, Flanagan D. Is screening with digital imaging using one retinal view adequate? Eye 2003; 17: 497–500.

23 Moss SE, Meuer SM, Klein R, Hubbard LD, Brothers RJ, Klein BEK. Are seven standard photographic fields necessary for classification of diabetic retinopathy? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989; 30: 823–7.

24 Schachat AP, Hyman L, Leske MC, Connell AM, Hiner C, Alexander J. Comparison of diabetic retinopathy detection by clinical examinations and photograph gradings. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 1064–70.

25 Bursell S-E, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA et al. Stereo non mydriatic digital-video colour retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo colour photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 572–85.

26 Rudinsky C, Hinz B, Tennant M, De Leo´n A, Greve M. High-resolution stereoscopic digital fundus photography versus contact lens biomicroscopy for the detection of clinically significant macular edema. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 267–74.

27 Gomez-Ulla F, Ferna´ndez M, Gonzalez F et al. Digital Retinal Images and Teleophthalmology for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1384–9.

28 Lin DY, Blumenkranz MS, Brothers RJ, Grosvenor DM. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standarized mydriatic color photography. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 134: 204–13.


ua40317
-->