Conceptos Categóricos

Crónicas de autores

Alberto Alves de Lima *

Autor invitado por SIIC

El trabajo aporta herramientas adicionales para el diseño de estrategias de enseñanza y aprendizaje

ESTRATEGIAS DE ENSEÑANZA Y ESTILOS DE APRENDIZAJE EN RESIDENTES DE CARDIOLOGIA

Los hallazgos de este trabajo indican que los residentes de cardiología tienen tendencia a desarrollar un estilo de aprendizaje dirigido a la aplicación del conocimiento.

*Alberto Alves de Lima
describe para SIIC los aspectos relevantes de su trabajo
LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY CARDIOLOGY RESIDENTS: ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING STYLES AND THEIR CORRELATIONS
Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice (EfH),
19(3):289-297 Nov, 2006

Esta revista, clasificada por SIIC Data Bases, integra el acervo bibliográfico
de la Biblioteca Biomédica (BB) SIIC.

Institución principal de la investigación
*Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Imprimir nota
Referencias bibliográficas
Alves de Lima A, Henquin R, Thierer J Lamari S, Paulin J. y col. ¿La forma de evaluar influye en los estilos de aprendizaje? Experiencia en una residencia en cardiología. Rev Argent Cardiol 70:478, 2002.
Alves de Lima A. A qualitative study of the impact on learning of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise in postgraduate training. Medical Teacher 27:46-52, 2005.
Bettati MI, Alves de Lima A, Sokn F y col. Estilo de aprendizaje profundo: Existen variables predictivas? Rev Argent Cardiol 70:156, 2002 (Abstract N°276).
Boyle E. Learning styles and academic outcome: the validity and utility of Vermunt´s Inventory of Learning Styles in a British higher education setting. Br J Educ Psychol 73:267-90, 2003.
Duffy TM, Jonassen DH y col. Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. En Duffy TM, Jonassen DH (ed). Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation Erlbaum, NJ USA, 1-16, 1992.
Eklund-Myrskog G. The influence of the educational context on students nurses’ conceptions of learning and approaches to learning. Br J Educ Psychol 67:371-381, 1997.
Gieger M. Changes in learning styles preferences: A reply to ruble and stout. Psychological Reports 70:1072-1074,1992.
Kosower E. Comparison of pediatric residents and faculty learning styles: implications for medical education. Am J Med Sci 312:214-218, 1996.
Marton F. Conceptions of learning. Int J Educ Res 19:277-300, 1995.
Marton F. Skill as an aspect of knowledge. Higher Education 50:602-614, 1979.
Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence /performance. Acad Med 65:S63,1990.
Newble DI, Gorgon MI. The learning style of medical students. Med Educ 19:3-8,1985.
Newble DI, Hejka EJ, Whelan G. The approaches to learning of specialist physicians. Med Educ 24:101-109, 1990.
Ramsem P. The context of learning. En Marton F, Hounsell D, Entwistle N (ed.). The experience of learning. Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh Scotlland pp.56-85, 1984.
Richardson J. Gender difference in the experience on higher education: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Educational Psychology 11:363-362, 1991.
Severiens S. Gender and gender identity differences in learning styles. Educational Psychology 17:79-93, 1997.
Severiens S. Gender and learning: comparing two theories. Higher Education 35:329-350, 1998.
Severiens S. Gender difference in learning styles: a narrative review and quantitative meta-analysis Higher Education 27:487-501, 1994.
Vermunt JD. The regulation of constructive learning processes. Br J Educ Psychol 68:149-171, 1998.
Vermunt J. Patterns in student learning: Relationship between learning strategies, conceptions of learning and learning orientations. Higher education 2003 (in press).
Vermunt J. The power of environments and the quality of students learning. In E de Corte, L Verschaffel, N Entwistle & Jan Merrienboer (Eds.). Powerful learning and instruction series. Oxford: Pergamon.
Vermunt JD. Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education 31:25-50, 1996.
Whitman N. Learning and teaching styles: implications for teachers and family medicine. Fam Med 28:321-325, 1996.


ua40317
-->