O DIAGNOSTICO DE DOENÇAS SEXUALMENTE TRANSMISSIVEIS, ATUALIDADES E PERSPECTIVAS





O DIAGNOSTICO DE DOENÇAS SEXUALMENTE TRANSMISSIVEIS, ATUALIDADES E PERSPECTIVAS

(especial para SIIC © Derechos reservados)
Doenças Sexualmente transmissíveis (DSTs) são causas importantes de morbidade e mortalidade em todo mundo, ocorrendo anualmente em milhões de casos e por diferentes agentes infecciosos
simoes9.jpg Autor:
Augusto Simões-barbosa
Columnista Experto de SIIC
Artículos publicados por Augusto Simões-barbosa
Coautores
Joaquim Xavier1;2*  Isabel Irene Rama Leal2**  Tânia Wanderley Paes Barbosa2** 
Universidade Católica de Brasília. Hospital Regional da Asa Norte – HRAN, DF, Brasil*
Hospital Regional da Asa Norte – HRAN, DF, Brasil**
Recepción del artículo
10 de Diciembre, 2003
Aprobación
9 de Enero, 2004
Primera edición
5 de Febrero, 2004
Segunda edición, ampliada y corregida
7 de Junio, 2021

Resumen
Doenças Sexualmente transmissíveis (DSTs) são causas importantes de morbidade e mortalidade em todo mundo, ocorrendo anualmente em milhões de casos e por diferentes agentes infecciosos como: Trichomonas vaginalis, Chlamydia trachomatis, Treponema pallidum, Papilomavirus humano (HPV), e o vírus da imunodeficiência adquirida humana (HIV). As DSTs tiveram sua incidência aumentada com a pandemia da AIDS e, em países em desenvolvimento, estão entre as 5 principais causas de procura por serviços de saúde. O diagnóstico laboratorial de DSTs é baseado em exame microscópico das células e secreções, dentre os quais destaca-se o Papanicolaou, testes sorológicos e isolamento microbiológico. No entanto, a era genômica vem mostrando as identidades genéticas de vários microorganismos patogênicos ao homem, com isso as DSTs podem ser identificadas através do diagnóstico molecular, o qual usa sondas de DNA com total identidade ou grande similaridade à seqüências conservadas do genoma dos agentes infecciosos. Com o conhecimento dessas diferentes seqüências é possível que se desenvolva métodos mais eficientes de diagnóstico. Tal qual a captura híbrida para detecção do HPV, um dilema há de ser enfrentado pelos países em desenvolvimento: o custo. Acreditamos que a melhor maneira de se enfrentar esta situação é o investimento em pesquisa e biotecnologia para que os próprios países em desenvolvimento alcancem seu sustento na produção de medicamentos e tecnologias de diagnóstico.

Palabras clave
DST, diagnóstico molecular, HPV, Papanicolaou.


Artículo completo

(castellano)
Extensión:  +/-6.92 páginas impresas en papel A4
Exclusivo para suscriptores/assinantes

Abstract
Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) are considered important human infections due to high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Millions of infections are registered every year as a result of several pathogens, such as: Trichomonas vaginalis, Chlamydia trachomatis, Treponema pallidum, Human Papilomavirus (HPV), and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). STD became a priority due to the HIV epidemy and, in developing countries, they constitute one of the main causes for people searching health care assistance. The laboratory diagnosis of STD is based on microscopic exam of cells and cervicovaginal discharge, such as the Papanicolaou, serological and microbiological investigations. On the other hand, genomic science is revealing the genetic identity of several human pathogenic microorganisms. Therefore, STD infections can be detected by molecular diagnostic tests with the use of DNA probes with high similarity to conserved genomic sequences of the pathogenic targets. With the knowledge of the genomes, it is possible to develop very efficient diagnostic methods. However, as well as the hybrid capture for the detection of HPV, a dilemma has to be faced by the developing countries, that is costs. We believe that the best way to overcome this difficulty is to invest in our own research and biotechnology projects. Thus, our countries can self-sustain the production of their own medicines and diagnostic technologies.

Key words
STD, molecular diagnosis, HPV, Papanicolaou.


Clasificación en siicsalud
Artículos originales > Expertos de Iberoamérica >
página   www.siicsalud.com/des/expertocompleto.php/

Especialidades
Principal: Infectología
Relacionadas: Atención Primaria, Dermatología, Epidemiología, Medicina Familiar, Medicina Interna, Obstetricia y Ginecología, Urología



Comprar este artículo
Extensión: 6.92 páginas impresas en papel A4

file05.gif (1491 bytes) Artículos seleccionados para su compra




Patrocinio y reconocimiento:
Agradecemos ao suporte financeiro da Universidade Católica de Brasília, e ao apoio técnico dos profissionais do Hospital Regional da Asa Norte, HRAN-DF.
Bibliografía del artículo
  1. World Health Organization. An Overview of Selected Curable Sexually Transmitted Diseases 1995; Geneva: WHO; Global Programme on AIDS Report.
  2. Over M, and Piot P. HIV infection and sexually transmitted diseases. In: Jamison, D.T., Mosley, W.H., Measham, A.R., Bobadilla, J.L. (Eds.), Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries 1996; Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
  3. Dôres GB, Taromaru EK, Gallo C. Aspectos atuais do rastreamento das lesões HPV induzidas e do câncer do colo uterino com métodos morfológicos e biomoleculares. Newslab, 1999; 35:196-205.
  4. Parker R, and Camargo Jr KR. Poverty and HIV/AIDS: anthropological and sociological aspects. Cad Saúde Pública 2000; 16(suppl.1): 89-102.
  5. Brabin L. Clinical management and prevention of sexually transmitted diseases: a review focusing on women. Acta Tropica 2000; 75:53-70.
  6. Wasserheit JN. Epidemiological synergy: interrelationships between human imunodeficiency virus infection and other sexually transmitted diseases. STD 1992; 19:61-77.
  7. Laga M, Manoka A y col. Non-ulcerative sexually transmitted disease treatment as risk factors for HIV-1 transmission in women: results from a cohort study. AIDS 1993; 7:95-102.
  8. Sewankambo N, Gray RH y col. HIV-1 infection associated with abnormal vaginal flora morphology and bacterial vaginosis. The Lancet 1997; 350: 546-550.
  9. Dallabeta G, and Diomi C. Treating sexually transmitted diseases to control HIV transmission. Curr Opin Infect Dis 1997; 10:22-25.
  10. Simões-Barbosa1 A., Feijó GC, Silva JX, Barbosa TW. A Six-years Follow up Survey of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Brasilia, Capital of Brazil. Braz J Inf Dis 2002; 6(3): 110-117.
  11. WHO. Bulletin of WHO. 1996; 74(4): 345-351.
  12. WHO. Cervical Cancer Screening: Managerial Guidelines
  13. Amaral, E. Current approach to STD management in women. Int J Gynecol Obst 1998; 63(Suppl.1):S183-S189.
  14. Gompel C, and Koss LG. Citologia ginecológica e suas bases anatomoclínicas. 1997; Editora Manole Ltda, São Paulo, Brasil.
  15. Koss LG. The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection: a triumph and a tragedy. JAMA 1989; 261:737-743.
  16. Lobo1 TT, Feijó G y col. A comparative evaluation of the Papanicolaou for diagnosis of Trichomonosis. Sex Transm Dis 2003; 30(9): 694-699.
  17. Lobo2 TT, Feijó G, and Simões-Barbosa A.. Relato de um estudo comparativo de diagnóstico da tricomonose no Distrito Federal. Newslab 2002; 53: 156-162.
  18. Tong CY, Mallinson H. Moving to nucleic acd-based detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2002; 2:257-266.
  19. Larsen SA., Steiner BM, and Rudolph AH. Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis. Clin Microbiol Rev 1995; 8-1-21.
  20. Bowden FJ, Tabrizi SN, Garland SM, Fairley CK. Infectious diseases. 6: Sexually transmitted infectious: new dianostic approaches and treatments. Med J Aust 2002; 176:551-557.
  21. Hunter H, and Handsfield MD. Color Atlas and Synopsis of Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2000; 216 pp. McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing. New York, N.Y.
  22. Sherman ME, Schiffman MH y col. Toward objective quality assurane in cervical cytopathology: correlation of cytopathologic diagnoses with detection of high-risk human papillomavirus types. Am J Clin Pathol 1994; 102:182-187.
  23. Ferenczy A. HPV, colposcopy and cytology HPV summit 1999; pag. 3.
  24. Mannos MM, Kinney WK y col. Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results. JAMA 1999; 281:1605-1610.
  25. Wright TC, Sun XW, Koulos J. Comparison of management algorithms for the evaluation of women with low-grade cytologic abnormalities. Obstrect Gynecol 1995; 85: 202-210.
  26. Mitchell MF, Schottenfeld D y col. Colposcopy for the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91:626-631.
  27. Poljak M, Seme K. Rapid detection and typing of human papillomaviruses by consensus polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Virol Methods 1996; 56:231-238.
  28. Mannos MM, Ting Y y col. Use of polymerase chain reaction amplification for the detection of genital human papillomaviruses. Cancer Cells 1989; 7:209-214.
  29. Brown TA. Sequencing genomes. In: Brown, T.A. Genomes. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NY 1999; 59-84.
  30. Briselden AM, and Hillier SL. Evaluation of Affirm VP Microbial Identification Test for Gardnerella vaginalis and Trichomonas vaginalis. J Clin Microbiol 1994; 32:148-152.
  31. Orle KA, Gates CA y col. Simultaneous PCR detection of Haemophilus ducreyi, Treponema pallidum, and herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 from genital ulcers. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34:49-54.
  32. Farrel DJ. Evaluation of AMPLICOR Neisseria gonorrhoeae PCR uisng cppB nested PCR and 16S rRNA PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37:386-390.
  33. Van der Pol B. COBAS Amplicor: na automated PCR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2002; 2:379-389.
  34. Leslie DE, Azzato F, Ryan N, Fyfe J. An asessment of the Roche Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis/Neisseria gonorrhoeae multiplex PCR assay in routine diagnostic use on a variety of specimen types. Commun Dis Intell 2003; 27:373-379.
  35. Buimer M, Van Doornum GJJ, y col. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoea by ligase chain reaction-based assays wiht clinical specimens form various sites: implications for diagnostic testing and screening. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34:2395-2400.
  36. Caul EO, Horner PJ, y col. Population-based screening programmes for Chlamidia trachomatis. Lancet 1997; 349:1070-1071.
  37. Fairley CK, Bowden FJ, y col. Sexually transmitted diseases in disadvantaged Australian communities. JAMA 1997; 278:117-118.
  38. Stary A. Chlamydia screening: which sample for which tecnhique Genitourin Med 1997; 73: 99-102.
  39. Madico G, Quinn TC y col. Diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection by PCR using vaginal swab samples. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36(11):3205-3210.
  40. Van der Schee C, Van Belkun A y col. Improved diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection by PCR using vaginal swabs and urine specimens compared to diagnosis by wet mount microscopy, culture, and fluorescent staining. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37(12):2127-4130.
  41. Mayta H, Gilman RH y col. 18S Ribosomal DNA-based PCR for diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38(7):2683-2687.
  42. Press N, Chavez VM y col. Screening for sexually transmitted diseases in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-positive patients in Peru reveals an absence of Chlamydia trachomatis and identifies Trichomonas vaginalis in pharyngeal specimens. Clin Infec Dis 2001; 32:808-814.
  43. Lewis DA. Chancroid: clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management. Sex Transmi Infect 2003; 79:68-71.
  44. Simões-Barbosa2 A, Lobo T, Feijó GC. Em busca de Parcerias para um Novo Produto de Diagnóstico de Doenças Sexualmente Transmissíveis. NewsLab 2002; 54: 138-146.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Está expresamente prohibida la redistribución y la redifusión de todo o parte de los contenidos de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica (SIIC) S.A. sin previo y expreso consentimiento de SIIC.
ua31618